Episode 58
From Starving to Stuffed
From Starving to Stuffed: The Evolution of Obesity in America
The rise of ultra-processed foods in the United States closely parallels the surge in obesity rates and increased caloric intake observed from the 1980s onward. Starting in the 1970s, shifts in food production and consumer habits paved the way for these foods to become dietary staples, ultimately contributing to the obesity epidemic we see today. Let’s explore how these changes unfolded and their direct link to America’s rising weight problem.
1970s: Setting the Stage for Ultra-Processed Foods
In the 1970s, the food industry underwent dramatic changes that laid the groundwork for the proliferation of ultra-processed foods.
- Economic Shifts and Agricultural Policies
- In 1973, new agricultural policies began to encourage farmers to produce more crops like corn, soy, and wheat. These policies made ingredients, particularly high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) from corn, much cheaper for food manufacturers to obtain (Nestle, 2002). As a result, companies could produce food more cost-effectively and in larger quantities, leading to affordable, calorie-dense, ultra-processed foods.
- Rise of Convenient Snack Foods and Fast Food
- At the same time, the popularity of fast-food chains and processed snacks grew. Brands like McDonald's, Coca-Cola, and Frito-Lay expanded their offerings and marketed these convenient, hyper-palatable foods to the masses. They loaded these products with refined sugars, fats, and additives to enhance flavor and shelf life, making them hard to resist and easily accessible.
- The “Diet” Food Craze
- The 1970s also saw a surge in demand for high-protein diet products due to growing concerns about carbohydrates. Low-carb became the flavor, and at any given time, 10% of the country was on low-carbohydrate diets. Ironically, these “diet” foods often contained as many or more calories as regular options.
1980s: Ultra-Processed Foods Take Center Stage, and Obesity Rates Start to Climb
By the 1980s, ultra-processed foods had fully embedded themselves in American diets, creating a foundation for the obesity epidemic.
- Processed Food Production Surges
- Food companies expanded their product lines in the 1980s, launching a wide range of snack foods, frozen meals, and sugary drinks. These foods were not only inexpensive but also tasty, thanks to the addition of refined sugars and fats, as well as preservatives to prolong shelf life (Monteiro et al., 2013). Marketing highlighted their convenience, appealing to busy families and individuals.
- Caloric Intake Climbs
- Alongside the rise in ultra-processed foods, average daily caloric intake also increased. Between the late 1970s and early 2000s, Americans consumed over 200 more calories per day. This rise came largely from high-calorie processed snacks and sugary drinks that were easy to consume between meals (Wright et al., 2004).
- Obesity Rates Begin Their Upward Trajectory
- During the 1980s, obesity rates started climbing. From 1980 to 2000, the obesity rate in U.S. adults jumped from 15% to 30% (Flegal et al., 2012). Children and teenagers weren’t spared either; childhood obesity rates nearly tripled, aligning with the increased availability of ultra-processed foods.
1990s: Fast Food and Convenience Foods Dominate the American Diet
The 1990s brought even more ultra-processed foods, solidifying their role in the American diet.
- Fast Food Reigns Supreme
- Fast-food outlets exploded across the country in the 1990s, offering cheap, calorie-dense meals that were easily accessible. These chains embraced supersizing, encouraging customers to choose larger portions for just a small price increase. As a result, Americans began consuming more calories per meal, often in ultra-processed fast food.
- Sugary Beverages Become a Staple
- Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) like sodas and sweetened teas, also skyrocketed during this decade. Many of these drinks relied on HFCS, delivering a heavy dose of empty calories without satisfying hunger. Studies show that sugary drinks don’t curb appetite the same way solid foods do, leading people to consume extra calories without feeling full (Malik et al., 2010).
- Caloric Intake Peaks
- By the end of the 1990s, Americans’ average daily caloric intake had reached new heights, with ultra-processed foods making up a significant portion of the diet. Research indicates that nearly 60% of Americans’ daily calories came from ultra-processed foods by the late 1990s (Monteiro et al., 2013). The rise in these calorie-dense, low-nutrient foods is directly correlated with increasing body weight and obesity rates.
2000s to Present: Ultra-Processed Foods and the Obesity Epidemic
As we moved into the 2000s, ultra-processed foods remained a dominant force in the American diet, pushing obesity rates even higher.
- Obesity Reaches Public Health Crisis Levels
- By 2020, nearly 42% of American adults and 20% of children were considered obese (Hales et al., 2020). Studies have consistently linked this trend with ultra-processed foods, which are designed to be “hyper-palatable” and, thus, difficult to resist. Their addictive taste profile has fueled a snacking culture, where more people consume larger portions and eat more frequently throughout the day.
- Calories from Ultra-Processed Foods Remain High
- Research shows that 60-70% of the average American’s daily calories now come from ultra-processed foods (Juul & Hemmingsson, 2015). These foods are often low in fiber, protein, and essential nutrients, which leaves people unsatisfied and more likely to overeat. Additionally, foods high in refined carbs and sugars cause blood sugar spikes and crashes, leading to frequent hunger pangs and cravings.
- The Health Toll Beyond Obesity
- Ultra-processed foods haven’t just contributed to obesity; they’ve also been linked to type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers. Their high-calorie density, poor nutritional profile, and use of additives have been shown to negatively impact health, making them a major public health concern.
- Efforts to Combat Ultra-Processed Food Consumption
- Despite public health campaigns promoting whole foods, ultra-processed options remain attractive for many Americans due to their affordability and convenience. In many low-income areas, they’re also more readily available than fresh, whole foods, perpetuating health disparities.
Conclusion: Ultra-Processed Foods and America’s Obesity Epidemic
Since the 1970s, the rise of ultra-processed foods in the United States has closely tracked with an increase in calorie consumption and obesity rates. As companies produced more of these convenient, highly palatable foods, Americans’ eating habits changed, leading to greater calorie intake through frequent snacking, sugary drinks, and supersized portions. The dominance of ultra-processed foods in the diet has not only contributed to rising obesity rates but also to an increase in related health issues like diabetes and heart disease.
Although efforts to reduce ultra-processed food consumption continue, their deep-rooted presence in American culture and food systems makes reversing the trend challenging. For a healthier future, we need a multifaceted approach that includes improved access to nutritious foods, public health policies, and greater awareness about the risks associated with ultra-processed foods.
References:
- Malik, V. S., et al. (2010). Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 33(11), 2477-2483.
- Monteiro, C. A., et al. (2013). Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obesity Reviews, 14(S2), 21-28.
- Nestle, M. (2002). Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. University of California Press.
- Hales, C. M., et al. (2020). Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017-2018. NCHS Data Brief, (360), 1-8.
Transcript
>> Dr. Terry Simpson: M Today we're tackling a topic that's as big as the
Speaker:problem itself. Obesity in
Speaker:America. How did starving in
Speaker:the Mississippi Delta in the 1960s to
Speaker:a nation grappling with an obesity
Speaker:epidemic. It's a fascinating story
Speaker:of policy, agriculture, culture itself and
Speaker:food science. So grab a fork and or a
Speaker:notebook and um,
Speaker:I am your Chief Medical Explanationist, Dr. Terry
Speaker:Simpson and this is Forku
Speaker:Fork University where we make sense of the madness
Speaker:in this case of obesity in America and bust
Speaker:it away.
Speaker:In the early 1960s America faced a
Speaker:shocking paradox. The land of plenty was
Speaker:also home to profound hunger.
Speaker:Images of children in the Mississippi Delta
Speaker:shocked the nation. Hunger wasn't just an
Speaker:abstract concept. It was a grim
Speaker:reality, especially for marginalized
Speaker:communities in rural America. Not only the Mississippi Delta,
Speaker:but also the Appalachians
Speaker:presidential campaign. In 1964, President
Speaker:Lyndon Johnson declared a war on
Speaker:poverty which included efforts to address
Speaker:malnutrition through uh, programs like food stamps and school
Speaker:lunch initiatives. These programs were life
Speaker:saving for many but
Speaker:scratched the surface of a much larger
Speaker:issue systemic inequality
Speaker:in food access.
Speaker:Forward to the 1970s where a different
Speaker:problem was brewing. Richard Nixon Secretary
Speaker:of Agriculture transformed
Speaker:how America produced food.
Speaker:Butts mantra was get big or get out.
Speaker:And farms shifted to monocultural crops
Speaker:meaning corn, soybeans, wheat, all
Speaker:heavily subsidized by the government.
Speaker:This surplus of cheap
Speaker:ingredients that became the building blocks of
Speaker:ultra processed food. We had
Speaker:ultra processed and highly processed food in the
Speaker:1960s and it consumed 6 to 10% of
Speaker:our diet. But now we had an
Speaker:abundance. High fructose corn
Speaker:syrup, hydrogenated oils and refined flours
Speaker:flooded the food supply making the
Speaker:ingredients for calorie dense nutrient poor
Speaker:products that became affordable and
Speaker:accessible. More so than ever,
Speaker:what started as a solution to hunger
Speaker:inadvertently laid the groundwork for
Speaker:obesity. Enter the age of abundance.
Speaker:By the 1980s, portion sizes in
Speaker:America began to balloon. Fast food
Speaker:chains eager to attract customers larger
Speaker:servings for just a few cents more. A
Speaker:strategy known as value marketing.
Speaker:This trend extended to sit down restaurants,
Speaker:uneven home cooking. What used to be
Speaker:a reasonable portion became a laughingly small
Speaker:compared for example the
Speaker:typical hamburger at McDonald's was about
Speaker:two and a half ounces. The
Speaker:Junior Whopper today is
Speaker:about double that.
Speaker:Meanwhile, ultra processed
Speaker:foods that were packed with sugar, fat and
Speaker:salt began to dominate the shelves.
Speaker:These foods weren't just cheap, they were engineered
Speaker:to be shelf stable, hyper palatable.
Speaker:Meaning they really taste good and
Speaker:almost impossible. You
Speaker:remember the Lay's potato chip ad from the 1970s?
Speaker:I bet you can't just eat one. The
Speaker:combination of bigger portions and calorie
Speaker:dense, nutrient poor foods begin
Speaker:the process of obesity.
Speaker:Waistlines expanded and although at this time, and
Speaker:not as much as they have become, so did the
Speaker:backlash. The low carb movement, championed by the
Speaker:likes of Dr. Atkins, promised weight loss by
Speaker:cutting out carbohydrates. Now the
Speaker:trick is that the term generic
Speaker:carbohydrates, he was mostly referring to
Speaker:junk food as opposed to fruits,
Speaker:vegetables, beans, whole
Speaker:grains, all of which aren't junk food, but a part
Speaker:of a healthy balanced diet that are made of predominantly
Speaker:carbohydrate, which do not tend to contribute to
Speaker:obesity. So while this low
Speaker:carb approach was effective for some, the
Speaker:diet often led to an increased consumption of calorie
Speaker:dense meats and fats, potentially
Speaker:undermining its benefits for calorie.
Speaker:Meaning people who bought into the
Speaker:low carb education
Speaker:believed that meats and fats did not produce
Speaker:fats and they were themselves in fact diet
Speaker:foods. Nothing like a, ah, 1200
Speaker:calorie thinking it's a diet
Speaker:food. On the other end of the spectrum,
Speaker:vegetarianism gained traction partly again as
Speaker:a response to the environmental and health concerns tied
Speaker:to industrial agriculture. So by
Speaker:focusing on whole food plant,
Speaker:vegetarians attempted to counteract the over processing
Speaker:of the modern diet. Both movements were
Speaker:reactions to the rise of ultra processed foods. But each
Speaker:had its own challenges in addressing the obesity
Speaker:epidemic holistically.
Speaker:The obesity epidemic isn't just a matter of
Speaker:personal choice. It's deeply intertwined
Speaker:with industrial practices and cultural norms.
Speaker:Addressing it requires more than just telling people to eat
Speaker:less and move more. It demands systemic
Speaker:from reforming agricultural subsidies to
Speaker:redesigning our food environments to make us easily
Speaker:have more available, healthier choices.
Speaker:But on an individual level,
Speaker:awareness is the key. Understanding the
Speaker:history power us to make
Speaker:more informed choices.
Speaker:But hope also has arisen, as you know, because among the
Speaker:obesity epidemic sciences introduced one
Speaker:promising new tool besides surgery,
Speaker:which are uh, the GLP1 receptor agonists
Speaker:were first introduced in 2005 by
Speaker:the brand name of Baeda, which was
Speaker:predominantly used for type 2
Speaker:diabetes because they proved
Speaker:remarkably effective in helping people
Speaker:manage their diabetes by
Speaker:decreasing insulin resistance. They did it by two
Speaker:mechanisms. They increased the production of
Speaker:insulin by the pancreas and
Speaker:they increased sensitivity of insulin
Speaker:from the tissue cells. What scientists
Speaker:know producing these drugs to patients with
Speaker:diabetes is that these patients started
Speaker:to lose weight. And weight loss, as
Speaker:you might think, is a remarkable option.
Speaker:The next generation of glp, uh, receptor agonists, you know
Speaker:the names of Ozempic, Zap
Speaker:found or Mounjaro. They also
Speaker:began to come in and it showed remarkable
Speaker:in diabetics that they were losing weight. So they
Speaker:began to test them, um, on people who were simply
Speaker:overweight and with amazing
Speaker:results have now become
Speaker:introduced. So how do they work?
Speaker:As you know, GLP1 stands for glucagon. Like
Speaker:peptide 1, it's a hormone that plays a
Speaker:role in regulating appetite and digestion. They mimic the
Speaker:action of actual GLP1, that
Speaker:which slows down gastric emptying, signaling, uh,
Speaker:your brain that you're full. So normally
Speaker:Your body makes GLP1 when it says, all right,
Speaker:we've had enough to eat, we're getting some food here,
Speaker:so we're going to slow down digestion so you're going to feel
Speaker:full. So works in the
Speaker:brain, it signals the brain that
Speaker:you're full. It is that head
Speaker:hunger that gets shut down when you
Speaker:eat food. Now here's what's
Speaker:fascinating. The GLP one
Speaker:lasts just a few minutes,
Speaker:but oftentimes these cells, which are
Speaker:located in the distal part of the small intestine, are
Speaker:destroyed by bacteria.
Speaker:Bacteria that happen to thrive in an environment
Speaker:of ultra
Speaker:foods. Now there's a lot of speculation of
Speaker:what I'm going to say now, but we do know the following
Speaker:facts for certain Certain bacteria
Speaker:clearly destroy the cells that make
Speaker:GLP1. And
Speaker:certain fibers like
Speaker:inulin allow those cells
Speaker:to thrive. Inulin is found in things
Speaker:like Jerusalem artichoke, chicory,
Speaker:etc. Also another group of fibers
Speaker:called beta fructans, which are found in whole grains
Speaker:and bananas. Cells to thrive while
Speaker:the ultra processed foods change the microbiome to bacteria
Speaker:that actually kill those cells. Let's get
Speaker:back to medication. These
Speaker:medicines blunt
Speaker:food noise or what we call the hedonic
Speaker:drive. You're seeking almost
Speaker:compulsive craving for ultra processed
Speaker:foods. Bet you can't just eat one.
Speaker:So while we like to think that big food is
Speaker:tricking our brain into the reward system,
Speaker:they simply discovered that
Speaker:salt and sugar and fat
Speaker:together, you are going to love it, especially with
Speaker:flavor. I mean, consider the book called the Dorito
Speaker:Effect, where we know that a Dorito has a lot more flavor than
Speaker:bland chicken. That's also why
Speaker:you can play through a bag of chips or a
Speaker:pint of ice cream without even realizing it.
Speaker:There's no fiber to stop you. You have that hedonic effect. But
Speaker:the GLP1 medications break this
Speaker:cycle. By reducing or blunting the
Speaker:brain's response to these foods, they
Speaker:enabled to regain control
Speaker:over their eating habits. So what's
Speaker:revolutionary about the GLP1 medications is how
Speaker:they're helping shift the narrative around obesity.
Speaker:For years, obesity was framed as a failure of
Speaker:willpower, even though those who studied
Speaker:myself and the AMA declared it a
Speaker:disease as early as 2013.
Speaker:These medications underscore the biologic
Speaker:underpinnings of obesity, showing that it's not
Speaker:just about eating less or exercising more, it's
Speaker:about addressing the in
Speaker:our bodies and brains that drive food
Speaker:intake. For many,
Speaker:GLP1s are creating a, uh, window of
Speaker:opportunity. People who once felt powerless
Speaker:against their cravings are finding it easier to make
Speaker:healthier choices, not m only to lose
Speaker:weight, but sustain those
Speaker:losses. This isn't a magic
Speaker:bullet. These medications
Speaker:clearly in clinical studies, work best when
Speaker:they are combined with diet and lifestyle
Speaker:against a problem that's decades in the
Speaker:making.
Speaker:Imagine realizing that you need
Speaker:to eat the pint of ice cream. A taste is enough.
Speaker:Redesigning your relationship and
Speaker:the lifestyle changes by eating more foods
Speaker:that contain fiber and contain the fibers like
Speaker:inulin and beta fructans. Allow your
Speaker:own natural GLP1s to
Speaker:repopulate.
Speaker:Now, between
Speaker:allowing your natural GLP1s to Repopulate
Speaker:to not needing the medications.
Speaker:And I want you to frame it in your brain this way.
Speaker:We want you to build a healthier relationship with
Speaker:food. We want you to enjoy whole.
Speaker:We want you to realize that grains are not the enemy.
Speaker:Whole grains actually reduce obesity, et cetera. Refined
Speaker:grains are, ah, not necessarily the problem, but they can be.
Speaker:But the closing message is this.
Speaker:You didn't gain the weight because of high fructose corn
Speaker:seed oils. You gained the weight because all of these
Speaker:things were processed together in uh, a tightly wonderful
Speaker:package that tastes delicious. But some
Speaker:ultra processed foods are quite good for you. Take whole grain
Speaker:bread. It's actually quite healthy.
Speaker:All ultra processed foods together.
Speaker:But with GLP medications, we are seeing how science can
Speaker:help counteract the damage caused by decades of ultra
Speaker:processed foods and oversized
Speaker:portions. And it's a reminder
Speaker:that solutions aren't, uh, just about an
Speaker:individual effort. They're about
Speaker:understanding the systems that created the problem
Speaker:and leveraging modern medicine to help reverse
Speaker:that trend. That's the promise and
Speaker:the challenge of the road ahead.
Speaker:Thank you for joining me on this episode of Forku.
Speaker:You can find references for this in my blog, which
Speaker:is@ah, yourdoctorsorders.com and
Speaker:forku.com so if you like
Speaker:today's discussion about obesity, ultra processed food
Speaker:and medications, hopefully it's given you something
Speaker:to chew on. Please be sure and share and
Speaker:describe. And always remember, your
Speaker:fork is a tool. It's not a weapon.
Speaker:Use it wisely. I'm
Speaker:Dr. Terry Simpson, and while I a
Speaker:doctor, I am not your medical
Speaker:doctor. If you seek to have GLP1
Speaker:medications, I'm not the guy to ask about them. I would
Speaker:ask you to please find a board certified
Speaker:medical physician who specializes in obesity
Speaker:medication. Plenty of doctors selling plenty of
Speaker:little GLP one like things out there which may or may not
Speaker:be good for you. So that's why I
Speaker:advocate people go to someplace like Accomplish Health, who, by
Speaker:the way, has not paid for that endorsement.
Speaker:Today's podcast was distributed by our
Speaker:and the pod God, Mr. Evo
Speaker:Terra. Thanks for listening, everybody. Until next
Speaker:time, enjoy your food, don't feel
Speaker:guilty, and if you need help, find a good board
Speaker:certified physician to ask for it.
Speaker:Hey, Evo, you know what I like about the new
Speaker:GLP1 medications? I like that we're
Speaker:empowering people to have a
Speaker:way forward with their fork.
Speaker:I kind of think it's fun.
Speaker:So here's the thing, doc. You gotta stop
Speaker:trying the, uh, food wordplay.
Speaker:It just makes me dig deeper into bags
Speaker:of ultra processed, uh, potato chips.
Speaker:You're not helping my problem.